Back

A cross-species single-cell epigenome kidney atlas identifies epithelial cells as a driver of epigenetic aging

Jeong, H.; Lake, B. B.; Diep, D.; Li, X.; Yan, Q.; Gisch, D. L.; Reinert, S.; Eadon, M. T.; Gaut, J. P.; Jain, S.; Zhang, K.

2026-01-23 genomics
10.64898/2026.01.22.700871 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Epigenetic aging is a hallmark of chronic diseases, arising from sustained injuries and unresolved repairs. To investigate cell-type-specific epigenetic alterations, we built a cross-species single-cell multi-omics atlas of DNA methylomes, chromatin accessibilities, and transcriptomes on healthy, injured (human) and aging (mouse) kidneys. We identified accelerated epigenetic aging dominated by tubular epithelia in diseased kidneys. The pathological state mirrors transcriptional trajectories observed in normal aging, driven by the preferential dysregulation of lineage-specific genes lacking CpG islands. Spatially, these epigenetic changes mapped to pathological niches of failed repair. Co-profiling of single-cell DNA methylation and 3D genome architecture revealed that epithelial repair states in disease undergo significant higher-order genome reorganizations, activating genes associated with renal decline. Our findings demonstrate that epithelial aging is driven by a collapse of 3D chromatin structure and local methylome integrity, which silences cell identity and promotes a non-resolving repair state.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 1%
37.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Genetics
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Aging
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Cell Genomics
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.1%
7
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
8
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.1%
9
Genome Medicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.3%
11
Molecular Cell
○ 350 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
12
Developmental Cell
○ 196 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
14
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Nature Cell Biology
○ 118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.7%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
19
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
22
Nature Cancer
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
JCI Insight
● 277 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
25
Nature Medicine
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.