Correcting for effect modification in the doubly-ranked non-linear Mendelian randomization method
Zhou, A.; Tian, H.; Patel, A.; Mason, A.; Yang, G.; Hypponen, E.; Burgess, S.
Show abstract
The doubly-ranked non-linear Mendelian randomization method can yield biased estimates when instrument strength varies across individuals due to gene-environment (GxE) interactions. We propose a simple strategy to mitigate this bias by modelling GxE interactions and removing the fitted GxE component from the exposure before stratification by the doubly-ranked method. In simulations, the proposed GxE correction strategy eliminated GxE-induced bias with null, linear and non-linear exposure-outcome relationships, and it did not introduce bias even when the effect modifier of the IV-exposure association was a confounder or was correlated with a mediator or collider of the exposure-outcome association. In empirical analyses of serum 25(OH)D, BMI, and LDL-C, falsification tests showed bias in the uncorrected doubly-ranked method. Under the selected panel of effect modifiers, the extent of bias attenuation achieved by GxE correction varied by exposures. GxE correction was most effective for LDL-C, with further support from analyses using negative controls (age at recruitment and sex) and coronary artery disease as a positive control. These findings provide proof of principle evidence that our proposed GxE correction strategy can mitigate GxE-induced bias in practice. Where applicable, we recommend implementing this GxE correction strategy as a sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of findings from the doubly-ranked method.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations 96%
- Estimation of time-varying causal effects with multivariable Mendelian randomization: some cautionary notes 95%
- An empirical investigation into the impact of winner's curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A structural mean modelling Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the lifecourse effect of adiposity: applied and methodological considerations 93%
- Analyses using multiple imputation need to consider missing data in auxiliary variables 93%
- A Hierarchical Approach Using Marginal Summary Statistics for Multiple Intermediates in a Mendelian Randomization or Transcriptome Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation 95%
- The effect of long-term adherence to physical activity recommendations in midlife on plasma proteins associated with frailty in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study 93%
- Meta-regression of Genome-Wide Association Studies to estimate age-varying genetic effects 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multivariate analysis of a missense variant in CREBRF reveals associations with measures of adiposity in people of Polynesian ancestries 93%
- GxE PRS: Genotype-environment interaction in polygenic risk score models for quantitative and binary traits 93%
- A Two-stage Linear Mixed Model (TS-LMM) for Summary-data-based Multivariable Mendelian Randomization 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for genetic effect heterogeneity in fine-mapping and improving power to detect gene-environment interactions with SharePro 95%
- Simultaneous estimation of bi-directional causal effects and heritable confounding from GWAS summary statistics 94%
- Causal mediation analysis for time-varying heritable risk factors with Mendelian Randomization 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.