Back

Rapid changes in population socio-economic status indicators are unevenly distributed in a rural Pakistani village

Azam, S. I.; Rasmussen, Z. A.; Hussain, E.; Chen, N. M.; Shah, W. H.; McCormick, B. J.

2026-01-27 public and global health
10.64898/2026.01.22.26344397 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSocioeconomic status is an important driver of health outcomes, but the drivers of change in household status over time are often overlooked in favor of cross-sectional metrics of convenience. This is especially challenging in remote populations in low- and middle-income settings. We report changes in socioeconomic status over two decades. MethodsDuring two studies on childhood health outcomes (1989-1996 and 2011-2014), socioeconomic data were collected through surveys and interviews in Oshikhandass village, a remote population in northern Pakistan. Observations included metrics of population demography, occupation and incomes, household structure and self-reported adult illness. Individual measurements are reported with summary statistics comparing the two time periods and multi-dimensional socioeconomic constructs are constructed from factor analyses to compare changes in relative household socioeconomic position over time. ResultsThe population had substantial investment during the early 1990s that specifically targeted suspected causes of poverty (electrification, clean water and female education). Within one generation, the village approximately doubled in population, was fully electrified, maternal illiteracy rates dropped from 70% to 27% and jobs opportunities proliferated from primarily agricultural to include a large number of service sectors. Simultaneously the population demography has transformed from stage 1 to stage 3 unlike the national trend that remains in stage 2. Despite secular trends to improved status, there has been approximately equal decline in relative position in the population due to small changes in access to resources. ConclusionThe transformation in human capital in this population is a testament to targeted investments to improve education and childhood health. In a single generation the population has transitioned faster than the national average, exemplified, for example, by individuals achieving higher education, including international, and the village becoming a magnet for migration from the surrounding population. The transition has not been evenly distributed, however, and access to land and resources have led to some households rising in relative position while others have fallen.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.5%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.3%
3
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
7
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
26
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%