A Statistical Framework to Infer the Mutation Model of Tandem Repeat Variants
Luna, L. G. F.; Iturbe, S.; Adam, C.; Pope, N. S.; Ortega-Del Vecchyo, D.; Rohlfs, R.
Show abstract
Tandem Repeats (TRs) have complex mutational patterns that depend on many properties of the analyzed loci. An accurate characterization of the mutation model that defines the evolution of each TR is fundamental to understand the genetic diversity patterns of each TR. Here we propose a computational method that leverages the rich information contained in the ancestral recombination graph (ARG) to estimate the mutation process that drives the evolution of one loci containing a TR variant. Our method is called TRAMA, Tandem Repeat ARG-based Mutation Analysis. TRAMA uses the genealogical history estimated at each loci, which is contained in the ARG, to estimate the parameters that define the mutation of a TR under two different mutational models: The Stepwise Mutation Model (SMM) and the Two-Phase Mutation Model (TPM). First we show that TRAMA can provide estimates of the mutation rate of a TR evolving under the SMM that are accurate or have a slight underestimation when the mutation rate is higher than 10-5. Then, we show that TRAMA can provide reasonable estimates of the parameters that define the TPM under certain conditions. We also show that TRAMA can do an accurate selection of the mutational model that better explains the genetic diversity patterns of a loci from two competing models: TPM and SMM. Then, we show that estimates of the mutation rate under the SMM are similar when using the true genealogical history compared to using a genealogical history estimated using an ARG inference program, SINGER. We also discuss potential extensions of our methodology to perform a more accurate characterization of the mutation model driving the evolution of TRs.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Why are rare variants hard to impute? Coalescent models reveal theoretical limits in existing algorithms. 94%
- Optimizing genomic sampling for demographic and epidemiological inference with Markov decision processes 93%
- Assessing the Performance of qpAdm: A Statistical Tool for Studying Population Admixture 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.