Back

Comparison of Human Intestinal Enteroids and Zebrafish Larvae models for replication of Human Norovirus

Chandran, S.; Vinje, J.; Huynh, K.; Gibson, K. E.

2026-01-25 microbiology
10.64898/2026.01.21.700872 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human intestinal enteroids (HIE) and zebrafish larvae (ZF) models support the replication of certain strains of human norovirus (HuNoV), the leading cause of viral gastroenteritis worldwide. The replication of 17 HuNoV (9 genotypes) positive stool specimens from patients ranging from 5 months to 83 years old was evaluated in both HIE and ZF models. The yolk of 3-day post-fertilization ZF larvae were microinjected with 3 nL 10% clarified stool suspension. Each day post-infection (dpi), 10 larvae were pooled as one sample, and two specimens were collected daily until 5 dpi. Viral RNA was extracted from harvested larvae and quantified using reverse transcription (RT) droplet digital PCR. For the HIE model, J4FUT2 K1 enteroid monolayers were inoculated with 100-fold dilution of each stool specimen. Viral RNA levels were quantified at 1 and 72 h post-infection using RT real-time PCR. All genogroup (G) I specimens (n=5) replicated in both models showing a 1 to 2.5 log increase in HuNoV RNA. Of the 12 GII specimens tested, 8 replicated in the ZF model and 7 replicated in the HIE model. Specimens that failed to replicate in each model were not the same, although most of them were GII.4 Sydney [P16]. One additional strain, GII.17[P17], replicated only in the ZF model. Among the GII strains, viral RNA increase ranged from 1.6 to 3.3 log in the ZF and 0.4 to 3.68 log in the HIE model. These data highlight variability in HuNoV replication efficiency across models, potentially indicating the influence of model-specific factors on replication. ImportanceHuman intestinal enteroid and ZF models have been independently shown to support replication of different strains of HuNoV, the leading cause of viral gastroenteritis worldwide. However, whether the same HuNoV positive stool specimens replicate similarly in both systems has not been examined. In this study, stool specimens positive for a range of HuNoV genotypes were tested in both models. While specimens from the GI genogroup consistently replicated in both systems, specimens from the GII genogroup showed variable replication, with some replicating in only one model and a couple of specimens not replicating in either model. These findings demonstrate that model specific biological factors influence HuNoV replication and highlight the significance of using complementary model systems to better understand HuNoV pathogenesis.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
21.9%
2
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.0%
3
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.0%
4
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.6%
12
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
13
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
20
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%