Back

Supervised machine learning versus expert assessment of ultrastructural changes in wild-type and OGT knockout macrophages

van der Meer, T.; Heieis, G. A.; Everts, B.; Faas, F. G. A.; Koning, R. I.

2026-01-23 cell biology
10.64898/2026.01.21.700795 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Automated transmission electron microscopy (TEM) generates large datasets that challenge traditional qualitative analysis of cellular ultrastructure. Quantitative assessment of structural differences between different samples remains difficult due to structural variability in thin sections of organelles. Here we applied supervised machine learning (sML) to segment, quantify and compare cellular structures -including nuclei, chromatin, mitochondria, rough endoplasmic reticulum, and endocytic vesicles- in large TEM images of wild-type macrophages versus those with altered cellular physiology due to deficiency in O-GlcNAc Transferase (OGT). sML revealed that OGT knockout macrophages are larger and more oval, with increased euchromatin, nucleoli size, and relative mitochondrial and rER surface areas. Comparison with six TEM experts showed sML provides more objective and sensitive quantification of subtle differences, while expert consensus is only achieved for larger structural variations. These findings demonstrate that sML enhances quantitative TEM analysis and complements human expertise in ultrastructural studies.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.3%
3
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
4
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
5
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
12
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
14
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
16
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
19
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
23
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
27
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
29
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%