A Computational Toolkit for Designing and Analysing Repeated Binary Choice Experiments
Costa, B. L.; Baldo, M. V. C.; Feher da Silva, C.
Show abstract
Adaptive human behaviour depends on the ability to detect regularities and probabilistic structures within a noisy environment. Repeated binary choice tasks, in which individuals predict one of two possible outcomes, have long served as a fundamental tool for investigating learning, reward processing, and decision-making under uncertainty. However, traditional analyses of these tasks often rely on coarse measures such as accuracy or mean responses, overlooking the temporal information contained in behavioural sequences. This paper introduces a mathematical and computational framework to improve the analysis of binary choice data. First, we employ higher-order Markov chains to generate sequences with controlled probabilistic dependencies, allowing for a more subtle examination of how participants extract information and learn temporal structures. Presenting analytical methods derived from time series analysis (autocorrelation, cross-correlation, shifting probabilities and Markov reconstruction) to extract structural information from simulated data of prototypical behaviours, we demonstrate how these methods can identify distinct decisional patterns that remain hidden when using conventional approaches. Finally, we validate the proposed toolkit by applying it to empirical datasets. By revealing nuanced but meaningful features of sequential decision-making, this framework enhances the interpretive power of probabilistic learning experiments. It provides researchers with tools to more accurately describe behavioural dynamics and deepens our understanding of the cognitive processes governing adaptive decisions in both healthy and clinical populations.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Hessian-based decomposition characterizes how performance in complex motor skills depends on individual strategy and variability 96%
- Predicting human decision making in psychological tasks with recurrent neural networks 95%
- Prediction of Covid-19 spreading and optimal coordination of counter-measures: From microscopic to macroscopic models to Pareto fronts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A nonlinear relationship between prediction errors and learning rates in human reinforcement learning 96%
- Joint modeling of choices and reaction times based on Bayesian contextual behavioral control 96%
- Dynamic integration of forward planning and heuristic preferences during multiple goal pursuit 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.