Back

Mutualistic rhizobia harbor genetic variation for traits related to parasite infection

Buxton-Martin, A. D.; Wood, C. W.

2026-01-21 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.20.700730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microbial mutualists partially determine many host traits, including traits related to infection by parasites. However, while microbial effects on host trait plasticity is fairly well established, whether microbial mutualists contribute to genetic variation in infection-related remains an open question. Here we paired 10 mutualistic Sinorhizobium meliloti rhizobacteria strains with 20 Medicago truncatula plant genotypes in an incomplete factorial design, and experimentally infected the plants with parasitic root-knot nematodes. We used this design to estimate rhizobia contributions to genetic variation in four infection-related traits: host resistance, parasite virulence, host tolerance, and mutualism robustness. We find that rhizobia contribute to genetic variation in host resistance and mutualism robustness, and to genetic variation in parasite virulence via genotype-by-genotype interactions with the host. Rhizobia did not contribute to variation in host tolerance. The influence of rhizobia strains on parasite resistance was partially explained by their effect on host root growth. These results underscores the influence that microbial mutualists have on their hosts response to parasite infection, and suggests that resource mutualists may impact host-parasite evolution. Teaser TextMicrobial mutualists like nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria influence their host traits. Past work indicates that different strains of rhizobia may influence their host plants interactions with nematode parasites. But how does this influence compare to the genetic variation present in hosts? We explore the contribution of genetic variation across rhizobia strains to infection-related traits in their host and find that rhizobia contribute to genetic variation for parasite resistance and virulence in their host.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.4%
3
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
5
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
11
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
20
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
21
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
23
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
25
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%