Back

Sequence-encoded differences in the conformational ensembles of CITED transcriptional activation domains impact coactivator binding

Do, T. U.; Kraft, E. J.; Chappell, G. F.; Parnham, S.; Berlow, R. B.

2026-01-21 biophysics
10.64898/2026.01.20.700670 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances in predicting and modeling conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) have provided much needed insights into sequence-ensemble relationships. It is thought that conservation of physicochemical properties, but not the exact identity or order of the amino acids, maintains IDP ensemble properties that are crucial for function. However, detailed experimental studies are still required to fully understand the relationships between sequence and function in IDPs. The human CITED proteins, which are fully disordered transcriptional regulators, share conserved C-terminal transactivation domains (CTADs) that interact with the TAZ1 domain of the transcriptional coactivators CBP/p300. The conserved CTADs harbor amino acid substitutions in regions that are known to be important for interactions of CITED2 with TAZ1, but the effects of these substitutions on TAZ1 binding for the other CITED proteins are unknown. Here, we use solution NMR spectroscopy, circular dichroism, and surface plasmon resonance to characterize the conformational ensembles, dynamics, and interactions of the CITED CTADs. The CTADs are disordered in isolation, although the CITED2 CTAD uniquely displays residual helical structure that is sensitive to ionic strength and protein concentration. In contrast, the CITED1 and CITED4 CTADs remain largely disordered and exhibit more uniform dynamics. Quantitative binding measurements reveal differences in thermodynamics and kinetics for the CTADs interactions with TAZ1, with CITED2 binding most tightly and CITED4 exhibiting significantly weaker affinity. Our results highlight the sensitivity of IDP conformational ensembles to minor sequence changes and the impacts that changes in IDP structures and dynamics can have on biological functions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
3
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.4%
4
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
7
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
12
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
21
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%