Back

Optimizing broadly neutralizing antibodies via all-atom interaction modeling and pre-trained language models

Song, Y.; Wu, F.; Wang, R.; He, B.; Yan, Q.; Huang, X.; Chen, S.; Yuan, Q.; Rao, J.; Tang, Z.; He, H.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Y.; Yao, J.

2026-01-21 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.01.20.700456 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antibody optimization is a fundamental challenge, and the identification of antibody-antigen interactions is crucial in the optimization process. However, current methods cannot accurately predict antibody-antigen interactions due to the lack of all-atom modeling, thus being unable to improve the time-consuming and costly traditional optimization techniques. We present InterAb, a novel model developed for predicting antibody-antigen interactions and optimizing antibodies through all-atom modeling and antibody language models. Leveraging the proposed all-atom modeling approach, AtomInter, and pre-trained antibody language models, InterAb outperforms existing methods in predicting antibody specificity and antibody-antigen binding affinity. In the antibody library we constructed, InterAb successfully identified antibodies capable of binding to influenza A virus. An antibody optimization framework, InterAb-Opt, was further developed for the optimization of broadly neutralizing antibodies. For R1-32 antibody, biolayer interferometry results reveal that 85%, 80%, 90%, and 67.5% of the 40 optimized antibodies exhibit enhanced binding affinities to wild-type SARS-CoV-2, Lambda, BQ.1.1, and EG.5.1, respectively, with a maximum improvement of up to 96-fold. For the newly emerging BA.2.86 and KP.3, 55% and 52.5% of the optimized antibodies notably transition from non-binding to binding. Neutralization assays demonstrated that the optimized antibody exhibited enhanced neutralization activity across multiple targets, highlighting the capability of InterAb-Opt in engineering broadly neutralizing antibodies. This technology enables precise analysis of antibody-antigen interactions and optimization of broadly neutralizing antibodies, holding promise for addressing challenges in immune evasion and vaccine design.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.0%
3
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
4
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
6
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
10
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.0%
12
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
15
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
17
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
18
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
24
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%