Back

Evolutionary genomics of local adaptation, climate vulnerability, and linarin metabolism in Opisthopappus longilobus

Jing, R.; Su, J.; Song, A.; Chen, W.; Wang, M.; Xue, J.; Zhang, Y.; Su, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Z.; He, J.; Ma, L.; Zhang, F.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, S.; Fang, W.; Jiang, J.; Chen, F.

2026-01-22 plant biology
10.64898/2026.01.20.700049 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Global climate change and human activities are posing substantial threats to biodiversity. The genus Opisthopappus (O. taihangensis and O. longilobus), endemic to Chinas Taihang Mountains, possesses great ecological, ornamental and medicinal value. However, it is confronted with the pressures of habitat fragmentation and climate change. Here, we present the first haplotype-resolved, chromosome-scale genome assembly of O. longilobus ([~]2.95 Gb) and re-sequence 115 individuals across its range. Comparative analyses show Opisthopappus is sister to Artemisia-Chrysanthemum, with Opisthopappus and Chrysanthemum diverging at 5.15-5.18 million years ago. A profound genetic divergence is evident between O. taihangensis and O. longilobus, resulting in two distinct lineages within each species, driven by geography and climate. Our analyses indicate restricted gene flow, low diversity, and recurrent demographic bottlenecks collectively contribute to their endangerment. By integrating population genomics and environmental variables, we identified 4,437 core adaptive genes linked to water deprivation, and metabolism. Genomic offset predicts higher maladaptation risk in populations under drastic climate change. Furthermore, diverged promoters of two O-methyltransferase genes, OMT250 and OMT310, likely underlie the differential acacetin/linarin accumulation between C. morifolium and O. longilobus. These findings advance understanding of Opisthopappus evolution and climate vulnerability, offering a model for genomics-guided biodiversity conservation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.