Back

Designing a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Timely Palliative Care in Heart Failure

Men, Y.; Wright, N.; O'Connor, G.; Kaur, H.; Suh, E.; Chen, J.; Kadhim, B.; Ahmad, T.; Beasley, M.; Segar, N.; Quang, J.; Sharifi, M.; Feder, S. L.

2026-01-22 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.20.26344491 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPalliative care improves quality of life and reduces healthcare utilization for people with heart failure, yet referrals remain inconsistent and delayed. Clinical decision support (CDS) offers a promising strategy to facilitate timely palliative care, but no CDS tool currently exists to specifically support palliative care decision-making in this population. MethodsGuided by the User-Centered Framework for Implementation of Technology (UFIT), we conducted a qualitative descriptive study of focus groups and interviews with referring (i.e., hospitalists, cardiologists) and palliative care clinicians across two hospitals in an academic health system. Using rapid qualitative and content analysis, we identified needs, contextual factors, and design requirements to inform CDS tool development for timely palliative care. ResultsClinicians (n=25) identified pain points in the current workflow, clinicians goals and expectations for earlier referral, and barriers to timely palliative care, such as timing uncertainty. Informational needs included prognostic and clinical data. Context reflected clinicians prior experiences with CDS tools, where they reported few options specific to palliative care and disliked interruptive "pop-up" alerts not tailored to clinical contexts or workflow. CDS requirements included incorporation of objective markers of clinical deterioration, tailored recommendations and workflow integration based on clinical acuity and palliative needs, and a clear, visually appealing design. ConclusionsClinicians identified critical information for a CDS tool to promote timely palliative care for patients with heart failure. These findings directly inform the design, workflow, implementation strategies, and future pilot testing of our palliative care CDS tool and subsequent clinical trial. Clinical Perspective1) What is new?O_LIThis study is the first to apply the UFIT framework to guide the development of a CDS tool to promote timely palliative care among patients with heart failure. C_LIO_LIThis work advances palliative care innovation by showing how a CDS tool can address barriers through integration of clinical and contextual insights. C_LI 2) What are the clinical implications?O_LIThis qualitative study informs the development of a clinical decision support tool to promote guideline-concordant palliative care in heart failure. C_LIO_LIFindings underscore that successful implementation of CDS tools depends on the tools alignment with established clinical workflows to enhance usability, support clinician adoption, and minimize workflow disruption. C_LI

Published in Heart & Lung · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.