Back

Integrating NMR Metabolomics and Glycomics for Early Cancer Detection in Patients with Non-Specific Symptoms

Kacerova, T.; Yates, A. G.; Larkin, J. R.; Shulgin, B.; Miller, J.; Harris Gleave, P. L.; de Jel, S.; Cheeseman, J.; Elgood-Hunt, G.; Schiffer, E.; Spencer, D. I. R.; Anthony, S.; Anthony, D. C.

2026-01-22 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.20.26344357
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly cancer diagnosis in patients with non-specific symptoms is limited by the lack of discriminatory tests. Within the Oxfordshire Suspected CANcer (SCAN) pathway, exploratory biomarker work showed that serum 1H-NMR-based metabolomics can identify cancer with high accuracy. SCAN2 tested whether integrating metabolomics with glycomics improves discrimination in a clinically complex, real-world population. MethodsSerum from 369 SCAN patients (59 cancers) was analysed using AXINON(R)lipoFIT(R)-derived NMR metabolomics and HPLC-MS glycomics. Machine-learning models were trained to predict cancer status, with performance assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of pooled cross-validated predictions. To place cancer risk in a broader clinical context, a second classifier modelling alternative non-cancer diagnosis was incorporated, and mean predicted probabilities from both models were jointly projected into a two-dimensional space, maintaining strict separation of training and test data. FindingsIntegration of glycomics with metabolomics improved discrimination, achieving an AUC of 0.88 in a refined cohort excluding dominant comorbidities. Cancer-associated bi- and tri-antennary glycans, including FA2G2S1, FA2BG1, and M5A1G1S1, differentiated cancer cases. A classifier targeting metastatic disease achieved an AUC of 0.80. Joint probability analysis preserved cancer-associated metabolic signatures across comorbidity burden, with projection-based classification achieving an accuracy of 89.8%. InterpretationThese findings validate the SCAN1 metabolomic signature in a more clinically complex cohort and demonstrate that integrating metabolomics with glycomics enhances cancer detection in patients with non-specific symptoms. Joint probability analysis provides an interpretable framework for cancer risk stratification within multimorbid diagnostic pathways, supporting the clinical potential of scalable multi-omics blood testing.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 2%
16.5%
2
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 1%
8.1%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 26%
6.9%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 1.0%
4.8%
5
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 4%
3.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 4%
2.7%
8
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
9
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 1.0%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 5%
2.5%
11
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Cell Genomics
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 5%
1.7%
16
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
20
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 16%
1.3%
21
EMBO Molecular Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
22
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
23
Metabolites
based on 10 papers
Top 0.7%
1.3%
24
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 92%
1.3%
25
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
26
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Gut
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Cell Reports
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
0.9%