Back

Inferring the number of spawning events from young-of-year genomic samples and otolith-derived birth dates: a richness-estimator perspective

Akita, T.; Yohei, T.; Hiroshige, T.

2026-01-21 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.19.700488 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Estimating the number of spawning events per female is key to understanding individual reproductive output in batch-spawning species, yet direct observation of spawning is often infeasible in the wild. Recent advances in genetic kinship inference enable the identification of maternal half siblings from young-of-the-year genomic samples, while otolith-based age determination provides reconstruction of offspring birth dates. Here we develop an offspring-based framework for estimating the number of clutches produced by individual females by integrating sibling structure inferred from genomic data with otolith-derived birth-date information. By recasting clutch identification as a richness estimation problem, we apply the Chao1 estimator to infer the total number of spawning events from incomplete offspring samples. Using simulation experiments, we evaluate how sampling effort and heterogeneity in clutch size influence clutch detection and estimation. Under uniform clutch-size distributions, modest numbers of offspring sampled per maternal family (10-20 offspring) yield accurate estimates of the total number of clutches, substantially outperforming naive counts of observed birth-date classes by recovering information from rare or unobserved spawning events. In contrast, skewed or multimodal clutch-size distributions lead to underestimation at low sample sizes, indicating that uneven reproductive output increases sampling effort required for reliable inference. Overall, our results demonstrate how offspring genomic data and otolith-derived birth dates can be jointly leveraged to reconstruct individual spawning histories under realistic sampling constraints. This perspective provides a framework for inferring within-season reproductive schedules in batch-spawning species, and highlights opportunities for integrating genomic and life-history data in fisheries monitoring and reproductive ecology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.6%
2
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
7
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
19
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%