Back

Mechanical, rheological, and sensory characterization of lion's mane mushroom steak

St. Pierre, S. R.; Boyle, L.; Vervenne, T.; Darwin, E. C.; Goodson, M. A.; Palomares, M.; Zhang, N.; Kuhl, E.

2026-01-22 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.19.700477 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mushrooms are increasingly recognized as delicious, nutritious, and sustainable foods, with an intrinsic umami flavor and fibrous microstructure that can approximate meat-like texture. Among them, lions mane mushroom has emerged as a promising candidate for whole-cut meat alternatives. Yet, its mechanical, rheological, and sensory properties remain largely unquantified. Here we show that a minimally processed lions mane mushroom steak exhibits distinctive mechanical, rheological, and sensory characteristics that position it favorably among existing meat alternatives. Despite its pronounced fibrous morphology, lions mane steak behaves predominantly as an isotropic material under both mechanical loading and rheological testing, with elastic stiffnesses of E = 33.2 kPa and E = 34.8 kPa in-plane and cross-plane. A fundamental challenge in alternative protein development is to understand how these measurable physical properties relate to human texture perception. In a complementary sensory survey, n = 21 participants ranked lions mane steak as more fatty, fibrous, moist, and meaty than eight animal- and plant-based comparison meats. Strikingly, our perceived sensory softness correlates inversely with our experimentally measured mechanical stiffness ({tau}=-0.60, p = 0.02) and rheological loss modulus ({tau}=-0.56, p = 0.03). Taken together, our results demonstrate that lions mane steak combines favorable mechanical performance with desirable sensory attributes and provide a mechanistic link between physics and taste. Our findings highlight lions mane mushroom as a compelling whole-cut alternative protein and underscore the value of integrated mechanical-sensory characterization for rational food design.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.7%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.6%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
5.0%
4
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.2%
10
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
12
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
14
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
21
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%
28
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%