Back

Ubiquitous functional synergy partially explains why most transcription factor binding is non-functional

Mateusiak, C.; Jia, E.; Plaggenberg, J. N.; Erdenebaatar, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shively, C.; Liao, G.; Mitra, R. D.; Brent, M. R.

2026-01-20 genomics
10.64898/2026.01.19.700460 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Most genes in whose promotor a transcription factor (TF) binds do not change in expression when the concentration of the TF is perturbed. No existing model can predict which bound promotors will respond and which will not. We hypothesized that a genes response to perturbation of a TF bound in its promotor can depend on which other TFs are bound there, a phenomenon we call functional synergy. This is distinct from cooperative binding, which is already accounted for in the binding location data. To investigate functional synergy, we created a comprehensive dataset on TF binding locations in yeast using a method that is orthogonal to chromatin immunoprecipitation. We then used mathematical modeling to identify high-confidence instances of functional synergy. We found that such synergies are surprisingly common. Responses to perturbations of 44 different TFs were modified by the presence of other TFs. 48 TFs served as modifiers, but some modified responses to many TFs. We conclude that (1) measuring the binding locations of a single TF will not, in general, reveal which genes the TF regulates, and (2) traditional networks linking TFs to their targets must be made substantially more expressive, allowing some TFs to modify the effects of others.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
26.6%
2
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.7%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
11
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
The Annals of Applied Statistics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
14
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
16
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
18
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%