Back

Maximum entropy networks predict fluctuations and stability of food web energetics

Clemente, G.; Caruso, T.; Chomel, M.; Lavallee, J.; de Vries, F.; Bustamante, M.; Emmerson, M.; Johnson, D.; Bardgett, R.; Garlaschelli, D.

2026-01-22 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.19.700332 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A central goal of ecology is understanding how the architecture of food webs, which represent the structural backbone of ecosystems, affects their stability. The analysis of stability in the classical sense of population dynamics (i.e. return to equilibrium) can be successful for a single instance of an empirical food web but ignores the multiplicity of alternative states in which the system could be found as a result of intrinsic variability and fluctuations. Here we propose and test a new methodology to reconstruct, from single empirical observations of a food web, the viable ensemble of alternative realizations respecting the observed resource-consumer linkages and empirical ener-getics. The reconstruction can be handled analytically within a maximum-entropy framework which predicts how empirical food webs access a multitude of alternative states with comparable stability and reactivity. The (measurable) entropy of the reconstructed ensemble directly quantifies this multiplicity and serves as a novel proxy of system resilience, that is the rate of return to equilibrium in response to an external perturbation. We show that the associated ensemble fluctuations provide explicit predictions for the expected response of food webs to external perturbations, such as anthropogenic or climate-induced stresses. We do that by validating the proposed fluctuation-response relation on empirical soil food webs subjected to experimentally controlled perturbations, confirming that intrinsic fluctuations in the unperturbed state predict responses to subsequent stresses. The perturbed states are associated with higher entropy, indicating less likely spontaneous recovery.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 4%
22.0%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 2%
17.1%
3
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.2%
5
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
9
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
11
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%