Back

Fungal volatiles drive lifestyle-dependent, systemic metabolic reprogramming in poplar

Zhu, P.; Zimmer, I.; Sivaprakasam Padmanaban, P. B.; Rosenkranz, M.; Ghirardo, A.; Schnitzler, J.-P.

2026-01-20 plant biology
10.64898/2026.01.19.700287 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIRationale: Although trees encounter diverse fungal communities, it is unclear how they adjust their physiology in response to fungal ecological strategies before physical contact. We tested whether volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by fungi are sufficient to induce systemic, lifestyle-consistent metabolic states in poplar roots and leaves. C_LIO_LIMethods: Populus x canescens roots were exposed to VOCs from a pathogen (Heterobasidion annosum), a saprotroph (Postia placenta) or an ectomycorrhizal mutualist (Laccaria bicolor) for six weeks in a contact-free pot-in-pot system. Untargeted LC-MS metabolomics characterized VOC-induced metabolic reprogramming in roots and leaves. C_LIO_LIKey results: Fungal VOC exposure alone reconfigured the metabolomes of roots and leaves, with strong discrimination between treatments despite belowground exposure. Poplar revealed a shared VOC-responsive component, but also fungus-specific programmes: pathogen VOCs produced a suppression-dominated systemic phenotype; saprotroph VOCs promoted lipid-centred metabolic activation; and mutualist VOCs elicited restrained, compatibility-consistent shifts with targeted pathway modulation. C_LIO_LIMain conclusion: Volatile-mediated surveillance allows trees to anticipate fungal lifestyle-associated cues and adjust systemic metabolism before physical contact occurs. This links airborne fungal cues to whole-plant physiological configuration and extends plant-fungal recognition beyond contact-dependent mechanisms. C_LI One-sentence summaryVolatile-mediated surveillance allows trees to anticipate fungal lifestyle and adjust systemic metabolism before physical contact occurs.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 2%
18.2%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
4
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
6
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
11
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
16
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.7%
18
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
19
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
23
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
26
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
27
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
28
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%