Back

Myeloid CD209 impairs T-cell activation by inducing ICAM-2-ERM-dependent cortical stiffening

Wang, C.; Pan, T.; Wu, J.; Wang, T.; Wang, H.; Zeng, B.; L, Y.; Yi, M.; He, R.; Feng, L.; Cui, Z.; Huang, G.; Shu, P.; Wang, Y.; Du, Y.; Li, Z.; Xiao, X.; Li, X.

2026-01-22 immunology
10.64898/2026.01.19.699861 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer immunotherapy has achieved durable clinical benefit in a subset of patients; however, most solid tumors--particularly immunologically "cold" tumors--remain refractory due to profound T-cell exclusion and dysfunction within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we identify CD209 (DC-SIGN), a C-type lectin receptor expressed by tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells, as a previously unrecognized myeloid-derived mechanical immune checkpoint that suppresses antitumor T-cell immunity. Using human CD209 knock-in mice, we demonstrate that therapeutic blockade of CD209 markedly enhances T-cell infiltration and activation, resulting in robust tumor regression across multiple models, including ovarian cancer and glioblastoma. Mechanistically, CD209 directly engages intercellular adhesion molecule 2 (ICAM-2) on T cells, triggering ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) phosphorylation and increasing T-cell cortical stiffness. This biophysical reprogramming destabilizes T cell-antigen-presenting cell conjugation and attenuates T-cell receptor signaling. Analyses of human cancer datasets and primary tumor specimens reveal that elevated CD209 expression inversely correlates with CD8 T-cell infiltration and is associated with reduced overall survival. Moreover, CD209 expression is significantly enriched in PD-1 therapy non-responders and positively correlates with TIDE (Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion) scores across multiple cancer types. Together, these findings establish CD209 as a central regulator of myeloid-driven T-cell mechanical dysfunction and highlight its potential as a therapeutic target and a candidate companion diagnostic biomarker for immunotherapy response.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.