Back

When should we use non-stationary adaptive management? A value of information analysis

Pascal, L. V.; Chades, I.; Adams, M. P.; Helmstedt, K. J.

2026-01-20 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.19.699800 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIMaking informed conservation decisions under climate change is a challenging task for practitioners, since decisions depend on changing environmental conditions and uncertain ecosystem responses to climate change. Given such uncertainties, the best practice to manage natural systems is adaptive management, where decisions dynamically adapt to the response of the ecosystem to previous conservation actions. Although adaptive approaches are optimal, they are also difficult to implement, have high computational costs, and recommend strategies that can be complex to interpret. These factors can hinder their on-ground application. On the other hand, simpler but suboptimal decision models can result in more interpretable recommendations, and might still yield good outcomes for ecosystems. Exploring trade-offs between complex optimal solutions and simpler sub-optimal solutions is essential for maximising conservation impact. C_LIO_LIIn this manuscript, we use value of information theory to help managers simplify their decision-models, while balancing optimality of strategies. Our approach provides modelling recommendations by determining the benefits of modelling non-stationary ecosystem dynamics and the uncertain ecosystem response to climate change. We illustrate our approach on four scenarios inspired from the management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, under different climate change trajectories. C_LIO_LIWe find that the two main drivers of the recommended reduction in model complexity are the strength of non-stationarity (e.g. climate change trajectory) and the degree of uncertainty in ecosystem responses to climate change (e.g. uncertainty in the thermal resistance of a coral reef). When non-stationarity is weak, the decision problem can be reduced from a non-stationary to a stationary formulation. Similarly, when uncertainty in the response to climate change is low, this uncertainty can be safely ignored in the decision-making process. Conversely, when non-stationarity is strong and/or uncertainty is high, our approach justifies the need to account for these complexities when making decisions, as simpler approaches would yield poor outcomes. C_LIO_LIThis manuscript guides managers in simplifying a modelling approach to manage ecosystems in the face of climate change. Our protocol can help simplify complex decision problems, allowing to reduce computational costs and enhance interpretability. By finding the balance between simplicity and optimality of models, this work contributes to bridging the gap between complex modelling and on-ground applications. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.9%
3
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
4
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
5
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.3%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
18
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
22
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
23
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
25
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
28
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
29
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
30
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%