Back

Visual Context Influences Lateral Balance While Walking on Winding Paths

Render, A. C.; Singh, T.; Cusumano, J. P.; Dingwell, J. B.

2026-01-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.18.700184 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Effectively navigating daily environments necessitates achieving adaptability while maintaining stability. This requires integrating sensory feedback, primarily from the visual system, to maintain balance and maneuverability as we walk. This study examined the impact of visual information salience on lateral balance and stepping. Twenty-eight healthy adults (16F/12M; 26.16{+/-}4.23 years) participated. Participants walked along each of two virtual paths (Straight vs. Winding), having each of two path color contrasts (High vs. Low), in each of two environments with differing visual richness (Rich vs. Sparse). We quantified stepping errors as the percentage of steps landing outside designated path boundaries. We computed means () and standard deviations ({sigma}) of the minimum mediolateral margins of stability (MoSL), and we computed lateral Probability of Instability (PoIL) to assess participants risk of taking unstable (MoSL < 0) steps. On Straight paths, participants made more stepping errors on Low (vs. High) contrast paths for both environments, and exhibited decreased{sigma} (MoSL) in Sparse (vs. Rich) environments on paths of both visual contrasts. On Winding paths, participants made the most stepping errors on Low Contrast paths in Sparse environments. They walked with smaller (MoSL) and exhibited higher PoIL on Low Contrast paths in both environments, and they exhibited higher PoIL in Sparse environments on paths of both visual contrasts. The effects of diminished visual information were far more pronounced on Winding paths (vs. Straight), hindering performance and balance maintenance, as these conditions challenged both mechanical and sensory mechanisms underlying balance control.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
4
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
6
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
15
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
20
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
28
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%