Back

EEG-Based Decoding of Color and Visual Category Representations Is Reliable Within and Across Sessions

Frenkel, C.; Deouell, L. Y.

2026-01-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.18.699677 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The human visual system represents stimuli in a rich and detailed manner. Traditional methods of studying visual representations in humans, such as event-related potentials (ERP), revealed numerous distinctions between the brain activity elicited by different categories of stimuli. However, these methods miss the information embedded in the spatial distributions of brain activity, or patterns, and are not always sensitive to study visual representations of different stimuli at the single participant or single trial level. Time-resolved multivariate pattern classification analysis (MVPA), or Decoding, efficiently extracts the visual representations of stimuli from the EEG topography without a-priori assumptions about the location of the effect in time and space at the single participant level. The rich information this method provides has increased its popularity dramatically in recent years. Yet, different participants show variable quality of decoding performance, and it is unclear if the accuracy of decoding is maintained within participants across multiple sessions, tasks, attentional conditions and visual features. In the current study, participants performed three visual tasks, over two sessions (1-7 days apart). We examined the correlation of decoding accuracy: within the cross-validation set, between sessions, between features (color and category) and to different measurements of the ERP signal and behavioral performance. We also examined how models generalized to different tasks and different attention conditions. We found that decoding accuracies varied substantially across participants, and that decoding accuracy was reliable within participant, over sessions, attention condition and task. This suggests the decodability behaves like an individual trait. Moreover, the spatial patterns underlying the decoding (classification weights) generalized across different tasks, attentional conditions and sessions. This suggests minimal representational drift at the resolution allowed by the EEG. We conclude that EEG decoding is a reliable method, and that visual representations are stable.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.9%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.3%
3
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.5%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
13
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
19
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%