Back

Terminally Differentiated Influenza-Specific Effector Memory B Cells Circulate after Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccination

Nellore, A.; Fucile, C.; Scharer, C. D.; Geer, J. T.; Lemonds, J. D.; Mousseau, B.; Zhou, F.; Zumaquero, E.; Akther, J.; Ivanova, E.; Murray, P.; Navarro, V. E.; Goepfert, P. A.; Duerr, R.; Herati, R.; Rosenberg, A. F.; Lund, F. E.; Randall, T. D.

2026-01-21 immunology
10.64898/2026.01.17.700068 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Live attenuated influenza vaccination (LAIV) is the only FDA approved mucosal vaccine. Easily assayed, circulating correlates of protection after LAIV are lacking. Using fluorochrome labeled hemagglutinin (HA) antigen, we previously identified a subset of HA-specific (HA+) IgDneg memory B cells that circulate after inactivated intramuscular vaccination (IIV), express the master transcriptional regulator, T-bet, as well as effector memory genes and predict durable antibody (Ab) responses to IIV. Here we profile the circulating HA+ IgDneg memory B cell response in a cohort of immunized patients who seroconvert after LAIV to identify which, if any, circulating HA+ B cells predict antibody responses after LAIV. Although we report LAIV elicits circulating T-bet+ HA+ IgDneg B cells that are phenotypically similar to those we described after IIV, we find no correlation between the magnitude of these cells and systemic HA-IgG responses after LAIV. Supervised and unsupervised analyses demonstrate that unlike IIV, LAIV preferentially elicits circulating HA+ IgDneg B cells that co-express TBX21 and the terminal effector cell gene, Zeb2. Consistent with their terminal differentiation status, LAIV-elicited T-bet+ cells cannot be recalled as short-lived antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) after systemic or mucosal antigen re-challenge. We conclude that the transcriptional profiles and functions of HA+ IgDneg B cells vary by influenza vaccine platform.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.