Back

A fast and simple algorithm for accurate spike detection in HD-MEA recordings

Zegers Delgado, J. A.; Renegar, N.; Pathirage, K.; Horiuchi, T. K.; Abshire, P. A.; Araneda, R. C.

2026-01-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.16.699955 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHigh density microelectrode arrays provide a strong platform to study individual neuronal activity and neuronal network dynamics. However, the analysis of high volume and complex data present several challenges. Common spike detection methods based on Root-Mean-Square (RMS) threshold crossing underestimate the number of spikes during neuronal bursting, which frequently occurs in neuronal cultures. In addition, the detection of action potentials by multiple electrodes makes spikes sorting a computationally expensive task. New MethodWe optimized a previously described detection method, based on the scaled median of absolute deviations (MED) that is more accurate during high rates of neuronal firing. In addition, we added a step to de-duplicate (DP) spikes recorded on multiple electrodes, which enhanced the accuracy of MED. The combined method of detection and de-duplication (DP-MED) is less computationally expensive and easier to implement than popular sorting alternatives like Kilosort-4. Results and ConclusionsDuring burst periods, the MED-based method detected over half of spikes that were undetected by the RMS-based method. To evaluate the performance of DP-MED, we simulated data that emulates neuronal activity recorded with HD-MEA. Across increasing firing rates, DP-MED shows more precision than Kilosort-4 but is slightly less accurate. After inducing high firing rate in cortical cultures with pharmacological stimulation, DP-MED detected a similar number of spikes than Kilosort-4, however, the analysis in Kilosort-4 was 40-fold more time-consuming. These results highlight the effectiveness of the DP-MED method in the context of drug screening using HD-MEAs.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.2%
2
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
7
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
11
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.6%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.9%
14
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
22
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
26
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%