Dual regulation of the receptor-like kinase BIR1 involves site-directed transcript cleavage and 5-leader-mediated translational control
Guzman-Benito, I.; Robinson, C.; Donaire, L.; Fernandez-Calvino, L.; Franco-Zorrilla, J. M.; Niu, R.; Xu, G.; Merchante, C.; Llave, C.
Show abstract
In Arabidopsis, receptor-like kinase BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE 1 (BAK1)-INTERACTING RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE 1 (BIR1) is a negative regulator of plant immunity and cell death. BIR1 was earlier described as a target of epigenetic and post-transcriptional silencing. Degradome analysis mapped predominant mRNA cleavage sites at the 5-untranslated leader region (site A) and the protein-coding sequence (sites B and C). Here, we identified another cleavage site (D) within the BIR1 coding region and investigated the contribution of site-directed mRNA cleavage to BIR1 regulation. Mutations at B, C, and D sites enhanced mRNA stability by impairing transcript cleavage, resulting in increased BIR1 mRNA and protein accumulation. This regulation is disrupted in RNA silencing mutants, supporting a model of cis-directed small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated degradation. Cleavage events are highly localized, occurring at a limited number of sites that involve only a few siRNAs. Furthermore, our data reveal a repressive role for the 5-leader in regulating BIR1 translation, potentially mediated by upstream open reading frames (uORFs) and a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) derived from the natural antisense At4g39838 locus. This lncRNA is complementary to a TCA-rich repeat region encompassing cleavage site A, which may serve as a putative binding site. Together, these findings reveal a multilayered regulatory mechanism that integrates sRNA-mediated cleavage with translational control, with broader implications for the fine-tuning of stress-responsive gene expression during infection.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Xanthomonas type-III effector protein XopS stabilizes CaWRKY40a to regulate defense hormone responses and preinvasion immunity in pepper (Capsicum annuum) 96%
- dsRNA-induced immunity targets plasmodesmata and is suppressed by viral movement proteins 96%
- N-terminally truncated helper NLR NRG1C antagonizes immunity mediated by its full-length neighbors NRG1A and NRG1B 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The receptor-like kinases BIR1 and BIR3 modulate antiviral resistance by different mechanisms 97%
- At-RS31 orchestrates hierarchical cross-regulation of splicing factors and integrates alternative splicing with TOR-ABA pathways 96%
- ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 115 integrates jasmonate and cytokinin signaling machineries to repress adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple ER-to-nucleus stress signaling pathways become active during Plantago asiatica mosaic virus and Turnip mosaic virus infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. 95%
- Spatial accumulation of salicylic acid is regulated by RBOHD in potato immunity against viruses 95%
- Functional requirement of the Arabidopsis importin-α nuclear transport receptor family in autoimmunity mediated by the NLR protein SNC1 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- TIR signaling promotes the interactions between EDS1/PAD4 and ADR1-L1 and oligomerization of ADR1-L1 95%
- Native ribonucleases process sgRNA transcripts to create catalytic Cas9/sgRNA complexes in planta 95%
- A network of RS splicing regulatory proteins controls light-dependent splicing and seedling development 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid analysis of strigolactone receptor activity in a Nicotiana benthamiana dwarf14 mutant 94%
- Factors that affect protein abundance of the bZIP transcription factor ABRE-BINDING FACTOR 2 (ABF2), a positive regulator of abscisic acid signaling 93%
- A complex role of Arabidopsis CDKD;3 in meiotic progression and cytokinesis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.