Back

Spatial Decoding of Tertiary Lymphoid Structure Maturation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Deep Neural Networks

Chen, B.; Foo, C.; Andersson, A.; Kayser, B. D.; Yang, Y.; Missarova, A.; Kulkarni, P.; Huetter, J.-C.; Chatterjee, S.; Kim, Y.; Liang, Y.; Killinbeck, E.; Murphy, S.; Fuentes, E.; Giltnane, J. M.; Jesudason, R.; Li, B.; BenTaieb, A.; Richmond, D.; Biancalani, T.; Johnston, R. J.; Lubeck, E.; Risom, T.; Rozenblatt-Rosen, O.; Wei, R.; McGinnis, L. M.

2026-01-20 genomics
10.64898/2026.01.16.697961 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the role of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) is crucial in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as they are associated with patient prognosis and treatment outcomes. Specific cellular ecosystems that originate anti-tumor activity or predict immunotherapy response remain poorly characterized. To this end, we developed a high-resolution, multimodal spatial atlas jointly profiling transcriptomics, proteomics, and histology to characterize TLS maturation in NSCLC alongside secondary lymph organs as a baseline. Using this atlas, we proposed a pathologist-in-the-loop framework that combines a variational graph autoencoder (VGAE) with diffusion pseudotime to refine human expert annotations and characterize TLS maturation. These spatial molecular representations were extended to H&E whole-slide images via a vision transformer-based foundation model. Next, we resolved cellular composition, spatial organization, and cell-cell interactions within these data and defined two divergent spatial ecosystems. Clinical evidence suggests that these ecosystems are associated with distinct patient outcomes: a mature germinal center niche with favorable prognoses, and a tumor-macrophage-fibroblast niche with unfavorable prognoses. In summary, our work decodes key components of TLS heterogeneity, identifies hallmark spatial patterns involved in NSCLC adaptive immunity, and provides a framework for translating spatial omics insights into clinical applications.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.