Back

Uncovering identifiability of epidemiological models: basic reproduction number and complementary data streams

Pant, B.; Saucedo, O.; Pogudin, G.

2026-01-19 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.01.16.26344284 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mathematical models of infectious disease dynamics are routinely fitted to surveillance data to estimate epidemiological parameters and inform public health decisions. Such data are typically discrete and noisy, but before attempting estimation, it is essential to ask whether the model structure itself permits unique parameter identification at least under perfect (continuous, noise-free) observations. This mathematical property of a model with respect to observation(s), known as structural identifiability, serves as a necessary precondition for reliable inference, since a model that fails this test cannot yield unique parameter estimates even from perfect data. In this study, we systematically investigate structural identifiability in various classes of compartmental epidemic models and establish two main findings. First, we present and deploy a methodology for assessing structural identifiability of epidemiological quantities of interest and demonstrate that the basic reproduction number exhibits identifiability across diverse model structures--including models with multiple transmission pathways and host-vector dynamics--even when individual parameters are not uniquely identifiable. These findings challenge the assumption that complete model identifiability is necessary for reliable epidemiological inference and suggest reformulating the central question from "is the model identifiable?" to "are the quantities that matter for the decision-making identifiable?" Second, we prove that incorporating minimal complementary data, as little as a single time-point measurement from an additional state variable, can make otherwise nonidentifiable models globally identifiable. This result has direct implications for surveillance design: rather than putting limited resources into frequent monitoring of multiple data streams or relying on external parameter estimates that may be uncertain or context-dependent, public health systems can strategically prioritize collecting high-quality complementary measurements.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.9%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.9%
3
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.6%
7
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
11
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
12
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
20
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
23
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
26
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%