Administration of Normal Saline versus Ringers Lactate in Critically Ill Patients: A Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan for a Secondary Analysis of the FLUID trial (FLUID-ICU)
McIntyre, L.; Fergusson, D. A.; Cook, D. J.; Fox-Robichaud, A.; Pugliese, M.; Taljaard, M.
Show abstract
IntroductionRecent evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses in the critically ill suggest small but clinically important differences in death and requirement for renal replacement therapy that favor Ringers lactate as compared to normal saline. To futher contribute to this evidence base, we will perform a secondary analysis of the FLUID trial with a focus on critically ill patients (FLUID - ICU). The FLUID trial was hospital wide cluster randomized cross-over trial that compared normal saline to Ringers lactate. ObjectivesThe primary objectives of FLUID-ICU are to examine the effect of Ringers lactate compared to normal saline compared to on the primary composite outcome and secondary outcomes in critically ill patients. As secondary exploratory objectives, we will evaluate the primary composite outcome and secondary outcomes within prespecified subgroups defined by age, sex, case mix group, Elixhauser Co-morbidity Index, presence of infection with organ dysfunction, traumatic brain injury, and trauma with an injury severity score of >= 12. MethodsFLUID was an open-label two-period, two-sequence, cross sectional, cluster-randomized cross over trial that was conducted in 7 hospitals in the province of Ontario, Canada. Hospitals were assigned to either Ringers lactate or normal saline for a period of 12 weeks and after a washout period, switched to the other fluid at 12 weeks. The primary composite outcome was death or re-admission to hospital within 90 days after the index admission. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome as well as length of stay in hospital, an incident emergency department visit post hospital discharge, initiation of dialysis within 90 days after the index admission, and discharge to a facility other than home. All data were obtained from health administrative databases. In FLUID-ICU, we will examine the primary and secondary outcomes in a cohort of critically ill patients, defined as patients admitted to the ICU within 1 day after admission to hospital. A sensitivity analysis will relax this definition to 2 days after admission to hospital. The analyses will be performed at the individual patient level using random effects logistic regression with adjustment for prespecified covariates. Ethics and DisseminationThe results of FLUID-ICU will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. As a secondary analysis of anonymized data, this study does not require research ethics board approval. All data is obtained from a population based health administrative database (ICES) in the province of Ontario, in aggregate and without patient identifiers.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 93%
- The COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium observational study: Design and rationale of a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study 93%
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 95%
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients (Helmet-COVID) Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Doxycycline for the prevention of progression of COVID-19 to severe disease requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission: a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial (DOXPREVENT.ICU) 94%
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: a study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Corticosteroids in COVID-19: Optimizing Observational Research through Target Trial Emulations 91%
- Chloroquine diphosphate in two different dosages as adjunctive therapy of hospitalized patients with severe respiratory syndrome in the context of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection: Preliminary safety results of a randomized, double-blinded, phase IIb clinical trial (CloroCovid-19 Study) 90%
- Effectiveness of casirivimab and imdevimab, and sotrovimab during Delta variant surge: a prospective cohort study and comparative effectiveness randomized trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.