I3LUNG: Clinical Validation of a Multimodal AI Tool to Support Immunotherapy Decisions in NSCLC
Prelaj, A.; Miskovic, V.; Sacco, M.; Ferrarin, A.; Licciardello, C.; Provenzano, L.; Favali, M.; Lerma, L.; Zec, A.; Spagnoletti, A.; Ganzinelli, M.; Lorenzini, D.; Guirges, B.; Invernizzi, L.; Silvestri, C.; Mazzeo, L.; Meazza Prina, M.; Corrao, G.; Ruggirello, M.; Dumitrascu, A. D.; Di Mauro, R. M.; Monzani, D.; Pravettoni, G.; Zanitti, M.; Macocchi, D.; Marino, M.; Cavalli, C.; Romano, R.; Giani, C.; Armato, S. G.; Esposito, A.; Bestvina, C.; Spector, M.; Bogot, N. R.; Basheer, R.; Hafzadi, A. L.; Roisman, L.; Watermann, I.; Szewczyk, M.; Olchers, T.; Richter, H.; Blanke-Roeser, C.; Sinisca
Show abstract
Despite a decade of immunotherapy, treatment selection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) still relies on subgroup analyses and clinical scores. I3LUNG (NCT05537922) is currently the largest international, real-world, multimodal, artificial intelligence (AI)-based trial, enrolling 2365 patients. We integrated real-world clinical data (RWD), computed tomography (CT) images, digital pathology (DP), and genomics (G) into machine learning early-fusion (MLEF) and deep-learning intermediate-fusion (DLIF) models. MLEF achieved consistent performance across outcomes (AUC{approx}0.74), with improved results in first-line patients (AUC up to 0.82). Multimodal models outperformed RWD in clinical-specific subgroups (AUCs up to 0.86). In the test set, AI models surpassed PD-L1, ECOG PS, NLR, LDH (all with p<0.01) and the LIPI score. The clinical usability study showed that expert and non-expert physicians could improve their prediction with the explainable AI (XAI) tool. The I3LUNG tool emerges as a clinically relevant decision-support system and is currently under prospective validation in >2,000 patients.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of clinical, pathological, radiological, and transcriptomic data improves the prediction of first-line immunotherapy outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer 96%
- Integrative ensemble modelling of cetuximab sensitivity in colorectal cancer PDXs 96%
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding pan-cancer treatment outcomes using multimodal real-world data and explainable artificial intelligence 96%
- Clinical interpretation of integrative molecular profiles to guide precision cancer medicine 95%
- Additivity predicts the efficacy of most approved combination therapies for advanced cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the Tumor Microenvironment Composition and Immunotherapy Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from Digital Histopathology Images 97%
- Explainable, federated deep learning model predicts disease progression risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 95%
- Generalizing AI-driven Assessment of Immunohistochemistry across Immunostains and Cancer Types: A Universal Immunohistochemistry Analyzer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Platform Omics Prediction procedure enables precision medicine in patients with stage-III melanoma 95%
- Federated Target Trial Emulation using Distributed Observational Data for Treatment Effect Estimation 94%
- DeePaN: A deep patient graph convolutional network integrating clinico-genomic evidence to stratify lung cancers benefiting from immunotherapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Driven Predictive Biomarker Discovery with Contrastive Learning to Improve Clinical Trial Outcomes 97%
- Targeting the mSWI/SNF Complex in POU2F-POU2AF Transcription Factor-Driven Malignancies 93%
- Evolutionary states and trajectories characterized by distinct pathways stratify ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma patients 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.