Back

I3LUNG: Clinical Validation of a Multimodal AI Tool to Support Immunotherapy Decisions in NSCLC

Prelaj, A.; Miskovic, V.; Sacco, M.; Ferrarin, A.; Licciardello, C.; Provenzano, L.; Favali, M.; Lerma, L.; Zec, A.; Spagnoletti, A.; Ganzinelli, M.; Lorenzini, D.; Guirges, B.; Invernizzi, L.; Silvestri, C.; Mazzeo, L.; Meazza Prina, M.; Corrao, G.; Ruggirello, M.; Dumitrascu, A. D.; Di Mauro, R. M.; Monzani, D.; Pravettoni, G.; Zanitti, M.; Macocchi, D.; Marino, M.; Cavalli, C.; Romano, R.; Giani, C.; Armato, S. G.; Esposito, A.; Bestvina, C.; Spector, M.; Bogot, N. R.; Basheer, R.; Hafzadi, A. L.; Roisman, L.; Watermann, I.; Szewczyk, M.; Olchers, T.; Richter, H.; Blanke-Roeser, C.; Sinisca

2026-01-22 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.16.25342913 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite a decade of immunotherapy, treatment selection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) still relies on subgroup analyses and clinical scores. I3LUNG (NCT05537922) is currently the largest international, real-world, multimodal, artificial intelligence (AI)-based trial, enrolling 2365 patients. We integrated real-world clinical data (RWD), computed tomography (CT) images, digital pathology (DP), and genomics (G) into machine learning early-fusion (MLEF) and deep-learning intermediate-fusion (DLIF) models. MLEF achieved consistent performance across outcomes (AUC{approx}0.74), with improved results in first-line patients (AUC up to 0.82). Multimodal models outperformed RWD in clinical-specific subgroups (AUCs up to 0.86). In the test set, AI models surpassed PD-L1, ECOG PS, NLR, LDH (all with p<0.01) and the LIPI score. The clinical usability study showed that expert and non-expert physicians could improve their prediction with the explainable AI (XAI) tool. The I3LUNG tool emerges as a clinically relevant decision-support system and is currently under prospective validation in >2,000 patients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.