The influence of force on the encoding and perception of affective touch
Faresse, S.; Thrace, L.; Ali, S. H.; Makdani, A.; McGlone, F.; Marshall, A. G.; Trotter, P. D.; Ackerley, R.
Show abstract
Stroking touch has been shown to be most pleasant at intermediate velocities of 1-10 cm.s-1, which relates well to activity of C-low threshold mechanoreceptors (C-LTMRs), also called C-tactile afferents in humans, that have been implicated in encoding positive affective touch. This well-established finding has been demonstrated at gentle stroking forces (typically 0.4 N peak normal force), yet few studies have investigated the effect of force on the perception of stroking touch or on the activity of C-LTMRs. Presently, we investigated the perceptual pleasantness and intensity of stroking touch (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30 cm.s-1) at different forces (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 N) on hairy forearm skin and compared this to responses from C-LTMRs during stroking touch at the same velocities, but over fewer forces (0.05, 0.4, 1.5 N). We found significant effects of stroking velocity and force for both tactile pleasantness and intensity ratings. Pleasantness showed the typical inverted-U shaped relationship over stroking velocities, but this was modified by force: higher forces significantly decreased pleasantness at faster velocities. Conversely, tactile intensity increased linearly with both increasing velocity and force. Recordings from five C-LTMRs showed that their firing frequency changed with stroking velocity, but that they were strongly modulated by force. Overall, we demonstrate the profound effect that force has on the perception of stroking touch, where tactile pleasantness and intensity appear to be a multi-faceted construct that are related to C-LTMR and A{beta}-LTMR activity, respectively, but that the firing in individual mechanoreceptor populations cannot fully account for percepts. Key Points SummaryO_LIThe skin is highly sensitive to small mechanical deformations, including dynamic touch and different forces. C_LIO_LIWe obtained perceptual ratings for touch pleasantness and intensity over different stroking velocities and forces applied to the forearm. This was also compared to microneurography recordings from C-low threshold mechanoreceptors (C-LTMRs). C_LIO_LIBuilding on previous work, we find that it is not only stroking velocity that affects pleasantness and intensity perception, but also stroking force. Pleasantness, ratings decreased more at higher forces when the stroking was faster. C-LTMR firing showed that force differences were readily encoded, although the same force-velocity interaction was not seen. C_LIO_LIThis work expands the literature on affective touch to encompass the effects of force, which clearly modulates pleasantness. C_LIO_LIC-LTM force and velocity information likely combines with information from all types of mechanoreceptors, including those from the fascia, to produce the resulting percept. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensorimotor memories influence movement kinematics but not associated tactile processing 95%
- When mechanical engineering inspired from physiology improves postural-related somatosensory processes 95%
- Closed-loop stimulation of lateral cervical spinal cord in upper-limb amputees to enable sensory discrimination 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of the anterior intraparietal sulcus and the lateral occipital cortex in fingertip force scaling and weight perception during object lifting 95%
- Principles of tactile search over the body 95%
- Effects of TMS over the anterior intraparietal area on anticipatory fingertip force scaling and the size-weight illusion 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tactile spatial discrimination on the torso using vibrotactile and force stimulation 97%
- Transfer of learned object manipulations between two- and five-digit grasps 94%
- Extended practice improves the accuracy and efficiency of goal-directed reaching guided by supplemental kinesthetic vibrotactile feedback 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.