Back

The origin and evolution of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds

Rule, J. P.; Park, T.; Kattan, M.; Grohe, C.; Taszus, R.; Palmer, S. M.; Hocking, D. P.; Adams, J. W.; Evans, A. R.; Brennan, I. G.; Pollock, T. I.; Sanfelice, D.; Marx, F. G.; Kohno, N.; Sabol, M.; Stoessel, A.; Flynn, J. J.; Cooper, N.

2026-01-15 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.14.699601 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Seals (pinnipeds) are the only mammals that can hear in both air and water. How and when they achieved the ability to negotiate such contrasting auditory media remains unknown. Here, we apply 3D shape and phylogenetic comparative analyses to a large dataset of caniform carnivorans (119 species, 217 specimens) to study the emergence of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds despite significant evolutionary constraints. We find support for the cavernous tissue as a functional and evolutionary mechanism for amphibious hearing. This tissue, which fills with blood during diving to equalise air pressure in the ear, enables a shift from in-air to underwater hearing by matching the acoustic impedance of the ear to that of the surrounding water. Early diverging freshwater pinnipeds had impaired hearing underwater. The first marine pinnipeds could hear amphibiously but were limited by a functional tradeoff between hearing abilities and the need to prevent damage from loud underwater sounds. Subsequently, otariids (eared seals) and phocids (true seals) independently acquired middle ear adaptations that expanded their underwater hearing range. This iterative evolution likely facilitated the exploration of novel auditory adaptive zones by crown pinnipeds, resulting in rare acoustic abilities like ultrasonic singing, vocal learning, and keeping rhythm.

Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.