Back

Common Genetic Variants of The Cardiac Sodium Channel Alter Patient Response to Class 1b Antiarrhythmics

Marras, M.; Josef, J. D.; Schuster, T.; Struckman, H. L.; Wagner, E.; Lee, L.; Smith, K. J.; Amsler, J. M.; Woodbury, L. S.; Marquez, E.; Moreno, J. D.; Silva, J. N.; Silva, J. R.

2026-01-14 physiology
10.64898/2026.01.14.699482 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Several common variants have been identified in SCN5A, which encodes the cardiac sodium channel -subunit Nav1.5 and is targeted by class I antiarrhythmics. Lidocaine and its analog mexiletine both have a primary amine that blocks Na+ current. While lidocaine is highly effective in terminating ventricular tachycardia after acute myocardial infarction, mexiletine has been shown to prevent arrhythmia induction in only [~]20% of patients. The factors underlying this inconsistent drug response are unclear. Here, we use cardiomyocytes that are derived from induced pluripotent stem cells to observe that a common polymorphism in the SCN5A gene, S1103Y, exhibits an altered pharmacological response to mexiletine, with enhanced use-dependent and tonic block of peak sodium current. In addition, an unexpected increase in late sodium current causes action potential prolongation. This paradoxical proarrhythmic phenotype shifts the paradigm of conventional antiarrhythmic therapy with mexiletine, suggesting that background variants may alter pharmacological responses leading to unanticipated consequences. Our results suggest that the unique genetic background of patients should inform therapeutic approaches to treat and prevent arrhythmias associated with common cardiac pathologies.

Published in The Journal of Precision Medicine: Health and Disease · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.