Back

Scalable Generation of Clinical-Grade Universal Human cDC1s Enables Potent Antitumor Immunotherapy

Liu, C.; Bi, S.; Chen, W.; Tian, Y.; Li, H.; Li, G.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhou, H.

2026-01-15 immunology
10.64898/2026.01.14.699162 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite decades of intensive clinical effort, monocyte-derived dendritic cell (DC) vaccines have not yet achieved sufficient clinical benefits in cancer therapy. Conventional type 1 DCs (cDC1s), a subset of antigen-presenting cells with superior cross-presentation capacity, are well established as pivotal mediators of antitumor immunity. However, their clinical translation has been hindered by the absence of scalable and efficient generation methods. Here, we develop a three-step strategy addressing this critical unmet need: a cost-effective, feeder cell-free, GMP-compatible approach enabling large-scale generation of cDC1s from human umbilical cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (CD34+ HSPCs). Starting from a single umbilical cord blood unit of CD34+ HSPCs, our method yields approximately 3.5x109 pure cDC1s--sufficient for over 700 therapeutic doses. These cDC1s exhibit robust antigen cross-presentation activity and substantial production of antitumor cytokines. Critically, in various humanized tumor mouse models, they elicit significantly stronger antitumor efficacy than either moDCs or PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) alone, pronouncedly remodel the tumor microenvironment (TME), and synergize with PD-1 mAbs to achieve enhanced therapeutic effects. Furthermore, our system recapitulates the complete in vivo DC differentiation trajectory: from CD34+ HSPCs through early-pre-DCs and pre-DCs to mature subsets (cDC1s, cDC2s, DC3s, mregDCs, ASDCs). This platform thus provides a powerful tool to dissect the regulatory mechanisms governing human DC subset specification. Overall, this work overcomes a long-standing bottleneck in cDC1-directed cancer immunotherapy and accelerates the clinical translation of DC subset-selective immunotherapeutic strategies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.