Back

Determinants of the plasma metabolome: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations over 6 years in the NESDA cohort

Klose, D.; Milaneschi, Y.; Han, L. K. M.; van der Wee, N. J. A.; Arnold, M.; Brydges, C. R.; Mahmoudian Dehkordi, S.; Kastenmueller, G.; Kaddurah-Daouk, R.; Penninx, B. W. J. H.

2026-01-16 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.01.14.26344096 medRxiv
Show abstract

The plasma metabolome represents a valuable molecular readout of a persons physiological state, yet its relation to health, stress and lifestyle remains underexplored collectively. Here, we conducted an untargeted metabolomics analysis using 3804 paired samples from 1902 participants of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety at baseline and 6-year follow-up, quantifying 680 plasma metabolites. We characterised five metabolome profiles using principal component analysis, three with distinct biochemical enrichments related to transmembrane transport, sphingolipid and amino acid metabolism. Metabolite levels showed moderate intrapersonal correlation between baseline and 6-year follow-up (ICCmedian = 0.482), and only 22% of metabolites showed standardized mean differences greater than 0.2, indicating minimal 6-year population-level change. Multivariate linear modelling on 18 determinants across demographics, psychosocial environment, lifestyle, somatic and mental health explained a maximum of 35% of baseline metabolome profile variance and 12.2% in 6-year changes. Demographic (e.g., sex, age), somatic health (e.g., BMI, medication) and lifestyle factors (e.g., smoking, alcohol intake) demonstrated strong associations, while psychosocial factors and mental health contributed minor explained variance. Altogether, our study provides novel insights into the cross-sectional and longitudinal implications of health, stress and lifestyle exposures for the plasma metabolome, contributing to the understanding of metabolomic signatures in population studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.