Partisan differences in health behaviors can impact respiratory disease dynamics
Soria, C.; Dorelien, A.; Feehan, D.; Mahmud, A.
Show abstract
The transmission of respiratory pathogens is fundamentally shaped by human behaviors such as interpersonal contacts, use of face masks, and vaccination. Political party affiliation has been shown to be associated with health-related behaviors. Yet, partisan heterogeneity in health-related behaviors is typically not included in infectious disease transmission models. Here, we leveraged uniquely detailed data from the Berkeley Interpersonal Contacts Study (BICS) on partisan differences in contact rates, mask usage, and vaccination patterns during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. We find substantial differences in health-related behaviors by political affiliation. Republicans reported a significantly greater number of average daily contacts, lower propensity of using masks and of getting vaccinated for COVID-19. These findings hold even after controlling for observable demographic and location-based differences across survey respondents. We adapt the classic Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model to incorporate partisan-specific behaviors and varying levels of political homophily to simulate an outbreak of a hypothetical respiratory pathogen. We find that the observed behavior differences lead to simulated Republicans experiencing higher infection and mortality rates and earlier peaks compared to Democrats. Incorporating greater within-group mixing further amplified partisan differences in disease outcomes. Finally, we show that failure to incorporate partisan behavioral heterogeneity in disease models can lead to inaccurate predictions about the size and timing of outbreaks in a population. SignificanceThe timing and size of infectious disease outbreaks are shaped by health-related behaviors that affect disease transmission. Using data specifically designed to measure interpersonal contacts and other health behaviors, we find that during the COVID-19 pandemic, Republicans reported a significantly greater number of average daily contacts, lower propensity of using masks and of getting vaccinated. These observed differences lead to Republicans experiencing higher infection and mortality rates and earlier peaks compared to Democrats in a model simulating a hypothetical respiratory infection. Incorporating a preference for within-group mixing further amplified partisan differences in disease outcomes. Failure to incorporate partisan behavioral heterogeneity in disease models can lead to inaccurate predictions about the size and timing of outbreaks in a population.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling the rhythms of human activity in the built environment for airborne transmission risk: a large-scale analysis of mobility data 94%
- Estimating the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 during periods of high, low and zero case incidence 94%
- Modeling the impact of racial and ethnic disparities on COVID-19 epidemic dynamics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying Asymptomatic Infection and Transmission of COVID-19 in New York City using Observed Cases, Serology and Testing Capacity 95%
- Dynamic Prioritization of COVID-19 Vaccines When Social Distancing is Limited for Essential Workers 95%
- Characterizing Population-level Changes in Human Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating primary and booster vaccination prioritization strategies for COVID-19 by age and high-contact employment status using data from contact surveys 96%
- Quantifying individual-level heterogeneity in infectiousness and susceptibility through household studies 96%
- How time-scale differences in asymptomatic and symptomatic transmission shape SARS-CoV-2 outbreak dynamics 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.