Back

Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Primary Aldosteronism

Parisien-La Salle, S.; Ferrebus, A.; Abel, E. E.; Tsai, L. C.; Newman, A. J.; Tsai, C. H.; Vaidya, A.; Brown, J. M.

2026-01-16 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.01.14.26343954 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) affect up to 15% of pregnancies and are linked to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Primary aldosteronism (PA) affects up to 25% of hypertensive patients. We examined PA prevalence in women with prior HDP and its relationship to hypertension trajectory. MethodsAdults from across the U.S.A. meeting guideline-recommended screening criteria for PA were prospectively tested. Women with a self-reported history of HDP completed a questionnaire examining the relationship between PA and hypertension trajectory. ResultsOf 330 hypertensive parous women (62.4 {+/-} 9.8y; 32.1% non-white), 83 (25.2%) reported a history of HDP. Women with HDP were younger at hypertension diagnosis (38.8 vs. 47.9y; p <0.001). The prevalence of a positive PA test was similarly high in those with and without HDP (26.5% vs 32%; p = 0.35). Among women with HDP, 63 completed the follow-up questionnaire, of whom 15 (23.8%) tested positive for PA. Compared with PA-negative women, those with PA reported a higher proportion of pregnancies complicated by hypertension (76.5% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.11) and fetal complications (55.6% vs. 27.9%, p <0.01). Hypertension trajectories also differed: sustained hypertension, defined as persistently elevated blood pressure beyond the postpartum period, was nearly twice as frequent in women with a positive PA test (66.7 vs. 37.5%; p=0.047). ConclusionOver 25% of women with hypertension and a prior pregnancy screened positive for PA, highlighting its high prevalence, irrespective of history of HDP. Women with HDP remain at elevated cardiovascular risk, and PA may represent a targetable contributor.

Published in Hypertension (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.