Back

Partner fidelity with root symbionts impacts plant performance in the face of changing above- and belowground community context

McLeod, A. M.; Stouffer, D. B.; Tylianakis, J. M.; Allen, W. J.; Waller, L. P.; Dickie, I. A.; Lai, H. R.; Bramon Mora, B.; Tonkin, J. D.

2026-01-14 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.13.699266 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Global environmental changes generate novel communities. Some species adapt to novel community contexts by demonstrating interaction fidelity, or consistently interacting with the same species, while others demonstrate interaction flexibility, or interacting with whichever partners are available (i.e., rewiring). However, the drivers and benefits of fidelity are unclear. Here, we use data from a large-scale mesocosm experiment to determine whether plant characteristics (e.g., provenance, functional group) and community contexts impact plant interaction fidelity to belowground mutualist and antagonist partners (i.e., root fungi and bacteria), and how this fidelity relates to plant performance. We found that the plant-antagonist relationships exhibited higher fidelity than plant-mutualist relationships with the strength of fidelity depending on a combination of plant characteristics and community context. Conversely, plant-mutualist fidelity impacted plant performance with competing effects depending on plant provenance and aboveground herbivore presence. Our study advances understanding of how species interactions influence plant performance in a changing world. Statement of authorshipAMM, JDT, JMT and DBS designed the concept. All authors contributed to refining the ideas. AM coded the analysis to produce the results with contributions from JDT, DBS, and BBM. HRL and DBS helped AMM with the statistical analysis. LPW, WJA, IAD, and JMT designed the experiment while LPW and WJA conducted the experiment. AMM wrote the first draft of the manuscript with assistance from all authors. IAD, JMT, and JDT obtained funding. All authors contributed to further editing of the manuscript.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.9%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.9%
4
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
13
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
14
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
17
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
18
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.9%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
24
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
28
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%