Back

The HIV-1 Silencer Bcl11B/Ctip2 Regulates The Tlr3-Mediated Cellular Response To Viral Infections

Kashif, M.; De Rovere, M.; Lelong, C.; Fenninger, S.; Wallet, C.; Schwartz, C.; ROHR, O.; Loustau, T.

2026-01-14 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.01.13.699245 bioRxiv
Show abstract

HIV-1 latency remains a major barrier to viral eradication. The persistence of the latently infected reservoirs results from multifactorial mechanisms controlling gene transcription and cellular responses to viral reactivation. The transcriptional repressor BCL11B/CTIP2 is known to promote the establishment and persistence of the latently infected reservoirs. However, its contribution to the cellular response to viral infection has not been investigated before. Together with HEXIM1, paraspeckles contribute to cellular innate sensing of viral infections and to the production of type I interferons. Paraspeckles are nuclear membrane-less organelles composed of proteins, including SFPQ/PSF and NONO, wrapped around the long non-coding RNA NEAT1. Here, we show that HIV-1 infection promotes a TLR3-mediated CTIP2 overexpression delayed from a transitory NEAT1 overexpression, paraspeckles formation and type I IFN production. In response to this interferon production, CTIP2 is recruited to the NEAT1 promotor together with HEXIM1 and repressive histone marks to inhibit NEAT1 gene expression. The resulting depletion of the paraspeckles abrogated INF production, dampening TLR3 signalling and reinforcing HIV-1 latency. Our results demonstrate CTIP2 as a dual-function regulator that silences HIV-1 transcription and restricts antiviral innate immune response as part of a negative feedback loop limiting the interferon response to viral infection. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=147 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/699245v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7ab0b0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e60aa6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c5564corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a4bbe0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.