The Ets transcription factor ETV4 regulates FGF1-dependent proliferation and glycolysis in ER-positive breast cancer
Sankofi, B. M.; Thomas, N. S.; Sekhri, M.; Cen, H. H.; Berry, W. L.; Murguia, S. J.; Velayutham, R.; Rudolph, M. C.; Wellberg, E. A.
Show abstract
Obesity is a risk factor for estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Beyond body mass index, adult weight gain increases breast cancer risk. During weight gain, hypertrophic adipocytes produce fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1), which drives estrogen-independent growth of ER-positive tumors. Effects of FGF1 on breast cancer cells include elevated proliferation and enhanced glycolytic activity. We identified the Ets transcription factor ETV4 as a target of FGF1 treatment across multiple breast cancer cell lines. Our objective was to define the role of ETV4 in mediating the tumor-promotional effects of FGF1, to better understand how weight gain and obesity drive breast cancer risk and progression. Here, we determined that ETV4 directly associates with a poor prognosis for patients with ER-positive tumors and positively correlates with FGF1 levels in the context of obesity. We demonstrate that ETV4 is required to mediate the pro-tumorigenic effects of FGF1 on cell proliferation, glycolytic reprogramming, and tamoxifen sensitivity in vitro, and on tumor growth in the presence of estrogen in obese mice. In vitro, ETV4 overexpression enhances proliferation and metabolic activity, mimicking effects of FGF1 on breast cancer cells, but it is not sufficient to promote ER-positive tumor growth before or after estrogen deprivation in vivo in lean females. This study reveals a potentially novel mechanism through which weight gain, characterized by excess FGF1 production, drives the development of aggressive features in the prevalent ER-positive breast cancer subtype.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Lineage plasticity enables low-ER luminal tumors to evolve and gain basal-like traits 95%
- PTHrP Induces STAT5 Activation, Secretory Differentiation and Mammary Tumor Progression 95%
- MDM2 Inhibition in Combination with Endocrine Therapy and CDK4/6 Inhibition for the Treatment of ER-Positive Breast Cancer. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A SNAI2-PEAK1 stromal axis drives progression and lapatinib resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer by supporting a cytokine expression profile that converges on PI3K/Akt signaling 96%
- Targeting STAT3 signalling using stabilised sulforaphane (SFX-01) inhibits endocrine resistant stem-like cells in ER-positive breast cancer 96%
- Postpartum breast cancer progression is driven by semaphorin 7a mediated invasion and survival 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cyclin E1 protein is stabilized in BRCA1 mutated breast cancers leading to synergy between CDK2 and PARP inhibitors 95%
- Progesterone receptors drive advanced breast cancer phenotypes including circulating tumor- and stem-like cell expansion in the context of ESR1 mutation 94%
- Skeletal muscle reprogramming by breast cancer regardless of treatment history or tumor molecular subtype 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hormonal regulation of Semaphorin 7a in ER+ breast cancer drives therapeutic resistance 96%
- Kinome focused CRISPR-Cas9 screens in African ancestry patient-derived breast cancer organoids identifies essential kinases and synergy of EGFR and FGFR1 inhibition. 94%
- STAT3 and GR cooperate to drive basal-like triple negative breast cancer gene expression and proliferation. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- HIF-dependent expression of creatine kinase brain isoform (CKB) promotes breast cancer metastasis, whereas cyclocreatine therapy impairs invasion and improves the efficacy of conventional chemotherapies 96%
- HERC1 regulates breast cancer cells migration and invasion 94%
- PRMT1 regulates EGFR and Wnt signaling pathways and is a promising target for combinatorial treatment of breast cancer 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.