Amplified genome editing by in vivo editor production
Ngo, W.; Rosas-Rivera, D.; Wasko, K. M.; Qiu, L.; Kang, M. H.; Gogna, S.; Zeng, J.; Hooks, M. T.; Wu, J. L. Y.; Li, Z.; Doudna, J. A.
Show abstract
Genome editing enzymes have vast therapeutic potential. However, achieving sufficient delivery in vivo remains a major challenge, because editing machinery is confined to the subset of transfectable cells in a tissue. Here, we tested the possibility that genome editing could be amplified in vivo by programming transfected cells to produce and transfer editing enzymes in lipid vesicles to neighboring cells. Our data show that this NANoparticle-Induced Transfer of Enzyme (NANITE) strategy tripled editing efficiency in cultured cells relative to non-spreading controls. Furthermore, a single intravenous injection of the NANITE plasmid into mice induced [~]3-fold higher levels of liver editing at the Ttr locus relative to non-spreading controls, with corresponding reductions in serum transthyretin levels. Amplifying therapeutic enzymes in situ offers a nonviral and non-infectious strategy to overcome low delivery efficiencies and reduce effective dose requirements.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A new universal chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR)- fragment antibody binder (FAB) split system for cancer immunotherapy 95%
- Pharmacological modulators of epithelial immunity uncovered by synthetic genetic tracing of SARS-CoV-2 infection responses 95%
- An in vivo screen identifies NAT10 as a master regulator of brain metastasis 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.