Back

Membrane proteins retain native architecture through native ESI and soft-landing

Fan, J.; DeAth, C.; Eriksson, L.; von Hallerstein, C.; Persson, L. J.; Oluwole, A. O.; Naseeb, N.; Qureshi, A.; Mesoy, S.; Seeley, L. T.; Knoblauch, S. B.; Kalmankar, N.; Marklund, E. G.; Esser, T.; Robinson, C. V.; Baker, L.; Rauschenbach, S.

2026-01-13 biophysics
10.64898/2026.01.13.699114 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Native MS offers a clear picture of membrane protein stoichiometry and interactions, but it lacks direct structural insights at high resolution. Here, we examine the extent to which solution-phase structure and architecture can be retained after native, soft-landing electrospray ion beam deposition (ESIBD) by interrogating several membrane-protein complexes of diverse folds and oligomeric states by cryoEM. The overall protein architectures with secondary structure motifs can be observed after gas-phase transfer, soft landing, and embedding in amorphous ice. Notably, we determined the structure of the ammonium transporter AmtB at sub-3 [A] resolution. It is nearly identical to the structure of the plunge-frozen control and even shows an extended C-terminal segment of AmtB, a dynamic region absent in the solution-phase structure. Our analysis shows that detergent adducts preserve membrane protein structure in vacuum by minimising destabilization of solvent-exposed regions and stabilization through additional polar contacts in vacuo. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations support these results, suggesting that a monolayer shell of surfactant adducts avoids destabilization driven by unshielded polar residues and disruption of hydrogen bond networks. Overall, our findings provide a structural framework for integrating native MS with cryo-EM showing that gas-phase transfer and surfactant stabilisation preserves key architectural features and high-resolution structure of membrane proteins.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.