Back

The order, but not the structure, of cross-domain learning influences memory consolidation

Temudo, A.; Benzley, O.; King, B. R.; Albouy, G.

2026-01-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.13.699035 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Everyday activities often require learning sequences that necessitate the involvement of both the declarative and the procedural memory domains. Previous research has shown that a learning structure that is common across tasks from different domains can improve learning and resistance to interference. However, it remains unknown whether such shared learning structure can enhance longer-term memory retention. To address this question, forty-eight healthy adults participated in a pre-registered study in which they learned both an object sequence task (declarative learning) and a motor sequence task (procedural learning) in two separate sessions separated by 4h. Participants were assigned to either an associated group, where the two tasks shared a common learning structure - that consisted of a specific mapping between finger movements and object categories across learning sessions - or an unassociated group with no such cross-domain shared structure. Memory retention was assessed with a 24h retest session on both tasks. Contrary to our predictions, a shared higher-order structure between tasks from different domains did not enhance memory retention. Exploratory follow-up analyses revealed that the order the tasks were learned (i.e., object or motor first), rather than their structural overlap, influenced performance. Specifically, learning the motor task before the object task impaired the consolidation of the object task irrespective of whether the tasks shared a common learning structure or not. This effect was unidirectional as learning the object task before the motor task had no effect on the consolidation of the motor task. Altogether, the current findings suggest that the order of cross-domain learning experiences rather than their structure influences memory consolidation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
2
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
10
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
16
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
20
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
25
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%