Back

Budget Impact Analysis Of The Introduction Of Ranibizumabs Biosimilar To The Jordanian Joint Procurement System.

Abu Hamida, J.; Alkhatib, N. S.; Abu-Hammou, K.; Halloush, S.; Baker, A.; Balkhi, B.; Alfayez, O.; Mousa, R.

2026-01-16 health economics
10.64898/2026.01.13.26344067 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe adoption of biologic therapies imposes a substantial financial burden on the Jordanian healthcare system. Ranibizumab is prescribed for various retinal disorders, and its associated costs are considerable. The introduction of biosimilars is beneficial in retaining desired clinical parameters while providing cost relief and enhanced access to patients. ObjectiveTo examine the budget impact and expanded access of switching to ranibizumabs biosimilar for the management of retinal diseases in guideline-based practice and in real-world practice in Jordan. MethodA 4-year budget impact analysis from Jordanian public sector payers sector was performed (2023 to 2026) that included patient prevalence and incidence, average ranibizumab dose per year, and anticipated shifts in the market share of ranibizumab and aflibercept. The model took into account the anticipated price erosion of the biosimilar in 2025 and 2026. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effect of changes in uptake rates, price, and market share. ResultsThe annual cost savings per patient when switching from aflibercept to ranibizumabs biosimilar were from 20.55 JOD (Jordanian Dinar) to 1519.93 JOD, translating to a percentage saving of 2.68% to 35.12% across the various scenarios and indications. The total budget impact ranged widely from 6.9 M JOD to 21.2 M JOD based on treatment regimens adjusted to current practice, PRN (Pro re nata), or T&E (Treat and extend). Patient access improved between 2.75% to 124.76% in the different scenarios. ConclusionThe introduction of ranibizumabs biosimilar significantly reduces the expenditures and enhances treatment access.

Published in Frontiers in Public Health (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.