Back

Gene regulatory network analysis identifies dysregulation of hypoxia pathways as contributing to glioblastoma multiforme treatment resistance in females

Adebari, T.; Fanfani, V.; Ben Guebila, M.; DeConti, D.; Shutta, K. H.; Lopes-Ramos, C. M.; Hsu, L.; DeMeo, D. L.; Quackenbush, J.; Eicher, T. D.

2026-01-15 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.13.26344041 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor that is notoriously resistant to treatment, with an average survival time of 17 months. While the overall outcome is poor for both males and females, sex differences in GBM incidence and outcome suggest sex-specific biological mechanisms underlie tumorigenesis. In contrast, low-grade glioma (LGG) is a less aggressive brain tumor that tends to have a better prognosis and a longer survival time. MethodsTo understand mechanisms contributing to treatment resistance in GBM in both males and females, we inferred gene regulatory networks (GRNs) for males and females with LGG and GBM using RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We analyzed these to identify both sex-specific and sex-stratified gene regulation in GBM. ResultsWe found few sex-specific differences in gene regulation in individuals with LGG, consistent with the lack of evidence for significant clinical endpoints dependent on sex. However, in GBM-we found sex-specific differential targeting of several pathways, including hypoxia and related pathways (carbohydrate metabolism, innate immune processes, and extracellular matrix pathways) known to be dysregulated in hypoxic conditions. In comparing between individuals with GBM, we found that females exhibited a greater degree of co-regulation between hypoxia with the aforementioned downstream pathways than did males. ConclusionsOur results suggest that dysregulation of hypoxia-related pathways in GBM plays a female-specific role in resistance to treatment and overall outcomes.

Published in Biology of Sex Differences (predicted rank #26) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.