Predicting Continuous Cognitive Decline: The Generalizability of a Multimodal Machine Learning Approach Including Structural MRI and Non-Brain Data
Hueppi, R. M.; Langer, N.; Vieira, B. H.
Show abstract
Aging is often accompanied by cognitive decline, but the extent, timing, and severity of this process is subject to large inter-individual variability. Predicting cognitive decline along a continuum, encompassing healthy age-related decline, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia, allows for more precise individual-level predictions. Previous work has demonstrated that machine learning (ML) models combining risk factors, clinical, neuropsychological, and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data can predict continuous cognitive decline. However, generalizability across independent datasets has rarely been evaluated. This study aimed to replicate previous findings using an independent dataset and to assess the models generalizability across acquisition sites. Multi-target random forest regression models were employed to predict annual rates of decline of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results showed that adding structural MRI data to non-brain data enhanced model performance in the large-scale novel ADNI (N = 1237) cohort, as previously attested for OASIS-3 (N = 662). Further, detectable reductions in performance were measured when models were tested across datasets compared to within datasets. This performance degradation was not explained by distributional shifts of the target variables. Additionally, models trained on the most important features of the respective training set achieved nearly identical performance as those trained on all features when tested externally, suggesting high redundancy among predictors. In summary, multimodal ML models predicting continuous cognitive decline generalize partially to unseen cohorts, with statistically significant performance degradation, whereas unimodal models trained on structural MRI features do not.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying the regional substrates predictive of Alzheimer’s disease progression through a convolutional neural network model and occlusion 98%
- Cross-dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models 97%
- From Big Data to the clinic: methodological and statistical enhancements to implement the UK Biobank imaging framework in a memory clinic 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary Validation of a Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Metric for Tracking Dementia-Related Neurodegeneration and Future Decline 98%
- Medial temporal atrophy in preclinical dementia: visual and automated assessment during six year follow-up 97%
- Cortical thickness and grey-matter volume anomaly detection in individual MRI scans: Comparison of two methods 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced expression of fMRI subsequent memory effects with increasing severity across the Alzheimer’s disease risk spectrum 96%
- Precision Brain Morphometry Using Cluster Scanning 95%
- Feature attention graph neural network for estimating brain age and identifying important neural connections in mouse models of genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.