Back

Efficacy and Safety of Sitafloxacin-Containing Regimen for Improved Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study

Zhang, Y.; Fu, H.; Zhang, C.; Xu, B.; Bi, K.; Yang, M.; Yu, H.; Li, Y.; Guo, J.; Wu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, K.

2026-01-16 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.01.13.26343918 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of sitafloxacin-containing regimens versus non-sitafloxacin therapy in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) pulmonary disease, focusing on sputum/BALF conversion rate, time of sputum/BALF culture conversion and radiographic improvement. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 149 adults (76 control group vs. 73 sitafloxacin group) with NTM pulmonary disease treated between 2021 to 2024. Inclusion criteria: (1) Sitafloxacin group: [≥] 3 months of sitafloxacin-based therapy; (2) Both groups: Confirmed diagnosis of NTM pulmonary disease and age [≥] 18 years old. Exclusion criteria: extrapulmonary/disseminated NTM, HIV, active tuberculosis, or incomplete clinical data. Primary endpoint: culture conversion rate and time to culture conversion. Secondary endpoints: radiographic improvement and adverse events (AEs). ResultsThe sitafloxacin group demonstrated significantly higher conversion rate (53.8% vs. 22.1%, P 0.001) and faster culture conversion than the control group without sitafloxacin (median 195 vs. 292 days, P 0.001). Radiographic improvement was more frequent with the sitafloxacin group (54.5% vs. 36.1%, P = 0.046). Compared to the control group, the sitafloxacin group exhibited no significant adverse events. ConclusionsSitafloxacin-based regimens accelerate microbiological clearance and promote radiographic healing in NTM pulmonary disease with good safety, positioning it as a viable drug for improved treatment of NTM infections.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.