Predicting intervertebral disc degeneration using Pyradiomics features and XGBoost classification
Muftuler, L. T.; Drobek, A.; Bukowy, J. D.; Duwe, K.; Sudersanam, V.; Harrington, J.; Van Zant, E.; Duenweg, S. R.; Shanbhag, D. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundDisc degeneration is the primary cause of low back pain, although the disc itself is not usually the source of the pain. Instead, it can lead to various clinically significant conditions that cause pain. However, there are no objective measures of the disc degeneration. PurposeLack of objective measures of disc degeneration may sometimes cause uncertainties in treatment decisions. Currently disc degeneration is graded by visual assessment of MRI, which often leads to uncertainty and disagreements. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a simple, efficient, accurate, and objective diagnostic tool for assessing disc degeneration. Study typeProspective (data acquired on site) and retrospective (data from online repository). PopulationLumbar spine MRI data from 277 participants are used. 208 of those were from an online repository and 69 were from our site. Field strength/Sequence3.0T; T2 weighted 2D and 3D fast spin echo pulse sequences. AssessmentA fully automated method is implemented where selected radiomics features are calculated from T2 weighted MRI and used for classification of the disc degeneration grade. Binary disc masks are generated using nnU-Net and radiomics features are extracted using Pyradiomics. Optimal preprocessing approaches are explored to obtain reliable feature calculations from repeated scans. Several advanced decision tree classification methods were also tested. Statistical testsF1 accuracy score, Area Under the Curve, confidence interval. ResultsXGBoost was in good agreement with the rater and the important features used in classification were in accord with expected changes in discs. Data conclusionAutomated evaluation of disc degeneration streamlines the physicians workflow and reduces uncertainties. Using radiomics features enables explainability and provides simple and robust training for machine learning approaches. Level of evidence2 Technical Efficacy3
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-scale machine learning model predicts muscle and functional disease progression in FSHD 93%
- MRI-derived Articular Cartilage Strains Predict Patient-Reported Outcomes Six Months Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction 93%
- Integrating Multidimensional Data Analytics for Precision Diagnosis of Chronic Low Back Pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- pyKNEEr: An image analysis workflow for open and reproducible research on femoral knee cartilage 93%
- Real-time three-dimensional MRI for the assessment of dynamic carpal instability 92%
- Improved Inter-Subject Alignment of the Lumbosacral Cord for Group-Level In Vivo Gray and White Matter Assessments: A Scan-Rescan MRI Study at 3T 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic segmentation of spinal cord lesions in MS: A robust tool for axial T2-weighted MRI scans 93%
- Body size interacts with the structure of the central nervous system: A multi-center in vivo neuroimaging study 92%
- Test-retest repeatability of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) measurements in the cervical cord 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pairwise learning of MRI scans using a convolutional Siamese network for prediction of knee pain 94%
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 92%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.