Back

fNIRS Characterization of Temporal Potentiation During Optimized Nerve Stimulation

Coltman, S. K.; Riggs, W. B.; Abdalmalak, A.; Hu, X.

2026-01-13 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.12.699125 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Restoring stable somatosensory feedback through transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TNS) represents a significant challenge in neural engineering; however, the cortical dynamics underlying sensory habituation are not yet well characterized. This study utilizes a multimethod functional near-infrared spectroscopy framework to quantify the temporal evolution of cortical engagement during optimized TNS. It was hypothesized that stimulation parameters fundamentally constrain the spatiotemporal profile of the hemodynamic response function. A General Linear Model with temporal and dispersion derivatives was used to analyze hemodynamic responses in 10 participants across three phases: validation, duration optimization (2, 5, or 10 seconds), and sustained engagement (45 minutes). During the optimization phase, 5-second stimulation produced the highest canonical amplitude with optimal dispersion characteristics, while 10-second trains resulted in significant temporal delays. During the sustained phase, parametric modeling indicated no linear decay in cortical response. Instead, the cortex demonstrated temporal potentiation, characterized by a transition from sparse early-phase activation to widespread late-phase recruitment across the sensorimotor network. The left posterior parietal cortex (BA5) served as a continuous integration hub, whereas primary somatosensory regions exhibited dynamic late-onset engagement. These findings quantify a nonlinear adaptation mechanism whereby engineered temporal spacing prevents neural saturation. The observed intersubject heterogeneity highlights the necessity for adaptive, closed-loop TNS controllers guided by real-time hemodynamic biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.