Back

Cytokinin Senescence Delay Is Shaped by Receptor Specificity and Metabolic Stability

Hasannin, O.; Khanna, R. R.; Singh, S.; Petrik, I.; Strnad, M.; Novak, O.; Cerny, M.; Rashotte, A. M.

2026-01-13 plant biology
10.64898/2026.01.12.699116 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Different cytokinin (CK) forms have distinct receptor affinities and metabolic rates, as seen in previous work with trans-Zeatin (tZ), isopentenyladenine (iP), dihydrozeatin (DHZ), and cis-Zeatin (cZ). However, it remains unclear how specific biochemical features of each form drives distinct tissue-specific physiological hormone output in response to application of these CK bases. Likewise, highly abundant N-glucoside CKs have also recently been attributed with having tissue-specific activities, yet their contribution to CK signaling output remains unclear. Here, we show that CK receptor preference and metabolic persistence together shape isoform-specific CK signaling strength, including tissue-dependent hormone responses in leaf versus root assays. We used physiological, genetic, and multi-omics integration in Arabidopsis to show that tZ and iP anti-senescence activity is matched by DHZ through a distinct receptor metabolic mechanism. DHZ requires AHK3[->]ARR2 signaling to be fully effective in Dark Induced Senescence (DIS) assay and overcomes its lower receptor affinity through higher metabolic persistence, accumulating at levels [~]2.5-fold above tZ and iP early in a senescence time course. Second, we demonstrate that N-glucosides, in a ratio-dependent manner, can act as modulators of CK response intensity. tZ N-glucoside co-applied with its base isoform tZ reduces CK signaling output by up to 41% as seen by pTCS::LUC in both protoplast transient expression and whole-leaf assays. Together, these findings provide a framework of how integration of receptor preference and metabolic stability determines CK isoform activity, in a model where abundant N-glucosides can modulate active CK signaling output.

Published in Plant Physiology (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.