Back

A Multiomic Analysis of Cachectic Mice Reveals Cancer Driven Suppression of Muscle Stem Cell Differentiation

Blackburn, D. M.; Hernandez-Corchado, A.; Sahinyan, K.; Khorasani, H. H.; Lazure, F.; Richard, V.; Qu, D.; Wang, S.; Borchers, C. H.; Jahani-Asl, A.; Najafabadi, H. S.; Koromilas, A. E.; Soleimani, V. D.

2026-01-16 cell biology
10.64898/2026.01.12.699072 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer cachexia affects a large proportion of cancer patients, inducing a rapid decline in muscle mass. Patients with cachexia have a worse prognosis and are less responsive to cancer therapies. The exact cause of cachexia remains unknown, nor are there any effective treatments for the condition. In this study, we use the C26 adenocarcinoma cell line to determine how cancer cells affect myofiber and muscle stem cell function. We determined that C26 cancer cells adapt to the host environment, in both male and female mice, greatly altering their transcriptome to promote their survival and growth. C26 cells directly communicate with muscle stem cells via GDF15 and MMP9. These circulatory factors cause the muscle stem cells to upregulate the EMT pathway and become less capable of undergoing differentiation and contributing to muscle regeneration. Muscle stem cells from tumor bearing mice are less proliferative and less prone to differentiation, Chromatin accessibility data shows that there are fewer accessible myogenic regulatory binding sites. Cytokine array determined that circulating GDF15 and MMP9 were highly upregulated and were derived form C26 tumor cells. However, blocking tumor derived GDF15 is not sufficient to prevent the onset of cachexia and rescue the loss of muscle stem cell function. Together, these findings establish a new conceptual paradigm in which cancer orchestrates muscle wasting through coordinated transcriptional, metabolic, and epigenetic suppression of muscle stem cell differentiation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.